USPTO serial 73668127
DURADISC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURADISC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MORIGUCHI CITY, OSAKA, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHONOGRAPH RECORDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |