Drawing for INFORMATION STATION

USPTO serial 73668367

INFORMATION STATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFORMATION STATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN LUKACHER

STE 2000LINCOLN FIRST TWRROCHESTER, NY 14604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER CONTROLLED VIDEO DISPLAY AND PRINTER, SPECIFICALLY FOR PRODUCT LOCATION, RECIPES, STORE COUPONS AND ADVERTISING IN STORES AND SUPERMARKETSABANDONEDApr 30, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 29, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 14, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance