USPTO serial 73668367
INFORMATION STATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFORMATION STATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN LUKACHER
STE 2000LINCOLN FIRST TWRROCHESTER, NY 14604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER CONTROLLED VIDEO DISPLAY AND PRINTER, SPECIFICALLY FOR PRODUCT LOCATION, RECIPES, STORE COUPONS AND ADVERTISING IN STORES AND SUPERMARKETS | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |