USPTO serial 73669042
SPANKLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPANKLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
UNIONVILLE, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FASHION ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, STRAPS, TIES, SCARVES, ADAPTED TO BE WORN AROUND THE ARM OR LEG | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |