USPTO serial 73671011
PAINFIBRE FIBREAD AT ITS BEST WITH CANADIAN WHEAT THE RICHES IN FIBRE TRY ME FOR ONE DAY AND YOU WILL WANT ME FOREVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAINFIBRE FIBREAD AT ITS BEST WITH CANADIAN WHEAT THE RICHES IN FIBRE TRY ME FOR ONE DAY AND YOU WILL WANT ME FOREVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BREAD, BUNS, BAGELS, COOKIES, MUFFINS, BAKERY GOODS, PREMIX FOR BAKERY GOODS, PIZZA PREMIX, PIZZA DOUGH, AND PIZZA | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIBREAD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PAINFIBRE FIBREAD AT ITS BEST WITH CANADIAN WHEAT THE RICHES IN FIBRE TRY ME FOR ONE DAY AND YOU WILL WANT ME FOREVER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |