USPTO serial 73671308
BUILDRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUILDRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM K. KONRAD
WILLIAM K KONRAD SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZSTE 5001880 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL, HARDWARE, NAMELY HINGES, LATCHES, BOLTS, PULLS, SCREWS, BARREL BOLTS, DOOR STOPS, HANDRAIL AND SHELF BRACKETS, HAT AND COAT HOOKS, HASPS, POLE SOCKETS, DRAWER GUIDES AND SLIDE, CORNER BRACES, SWAG HOOKS, SNAPS AND SWIVELS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |