Drawing for CARLTON SPECIAL LIGHT

USPTO serial 73671511

CARLTON SPECIAL LIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARLTON SPECIAL LIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES BERMAN

CHARLES BERMAN SHELDON & MAKSTE 800201 S LAKE AVEPASADENA, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BEVERAGES MADE OF MALT AND HOPS, NAMELY, BEER, ALE, PORTER, AND STOUTABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 1992PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Feb 4, 1991PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 10, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1988NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Aug 5, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance