USPTO serial 73673831
KANGARUCCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANGARUCCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, TOWELS, BED AND TABLE COVERS, BATH LINEN SHEETS, PILLOW CASES, EIDERDOWNS, VALENCES, BED AND TABLE LINEN, BEDSPREADS, FURNITURE COVERINGS, CURTAINS, FACE TOWELS, HANDKERCHIEFS, MATTRESS COVERS, QUILTS, TABLE CLOTHS AND TEXTILE FABRICS FOR USE IN MAKING CLOTHING, LINENS AND HOME FURNISHINGS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |