USPTO serial 73674416
WESTFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1534960Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WESTFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHAMPAIGN, IL
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN C. DOOLEY
DAVID MEYER330 N NEIL STCHAMPAIGN, IL 61820UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ METAL BLINDS, METAL DRAPERY RODS, BRACKETS AND PULLEYS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1987 |
| 019 | [ WOOD SHADES, SHUTTERS AND BLINDS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1987 |
| 020 | [ PLEATED WINDOW SHADES, SOFT WINDOW SHADES, SLATTED INDOOR BLINDS, PILLOWS, AND PLASTIC DRAPERY RODS, BRACKETS AND PULLEYS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1987 |
| 024 | DRAPERIES, UPHOLSTERY FABRIC, TEXTILE TABLECLOTHS AND NAPKINS, TEXTILE CORNICES, TEXTILE SHADOW BOXES, TEXTILE SWOOPS, TEXTILE SWAGS, TEXTILE VALANCES AND TEXTILE JABOTS; AND SLIP COVERS | EXPIRED | Feb 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEYERS, DAVID
- Other trademarks owned by AERO DRAPERY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AERO DRAPERY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AERO DRAPERY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named WESTFIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |