USPTO serial 73675166
COLEMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLEMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PHOENIX, AZ
PHOENIX, AZ
WICHITA, CA
WICHITA, CA
PHOENIX, AZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | SPAS IN THE NATURE OF HEATED POOLS | ABANDONED | Nov 17, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COLEMAN SPAS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COLEMAN COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by COLEMAN COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by COLEMAN COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by COLEMAN COMPANY, INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named COLEMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |