USPTO serial 73675735
SMART DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD G. LEAVITT
DONALD G LEAVITT SENNIGER, POWERS, LEAVITT AND ROEDEL611 OLIVE STST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | BUILDING HOSPITALS AND HEALTHCARE FACILITIES FOR OTHERS | ABANDONED | Feb 18, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |