USPTO serial 73675815
MIURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
EHIME-KEN, JP
Other trademarks owned by MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
EHIME-KEN, JP
Other trademarks owned by MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
EHIME-KEN, JP
Other trademarks owned by MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CURTIS B. HAMRE
DANIELLE I MATTESSICH MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | BOILERS, WATER HEATER FOR HEATING APPARATUS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
- Other trademarks owned by MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
- Other trademarks owned by MIURA CO., LTD. (MIURA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MIURA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 24, 1996 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 20, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |