Drawing for WINESODA

USPTO serial 73676650

WINESODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINESODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT D. LITOWITZ

ROBERT D LITOWITZ FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES FOR MIXING AND DISPENSING WINE COOLERS, CARBONATED FRUIT DRINKS, AND OTHER CARBONATED BEVERAGESABANDONEDOct 30, 1986
033WINE COOLERSABANDONEDOct 30, 1986
042RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WINE COOLERS, CARBONATED FRUIT DRINKS, AND OTHER CARBONATED BEVERAGESABANDONEDOct 30, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 1991PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 26, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1988PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 23, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance