Drawing for UNITED'S ORCHID ISLAND

USPTO serial 73677167

UNITED'S ORCHID ISLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNITED'S ORCHID ISLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID W. PETTIS, JR.

DAVID W PETTIS JR PETTIS & MCDONALDP O BOX 1528TAMPA, FL 33601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031FRESH GRAPEFRUITABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 13, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 1990EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 4, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 12, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 29, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance