USPTO serial 73677242
WORLD MORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORLD MORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TENNOJI-KU, OSAKA, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWIN E. GREIGG
EDWIN E GREIGGSTE 220727 23RD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY, NAMELY, NECKLACES, PENDANTS, EARRINGS, BRACELETS, BROOCHES, LOCKETS, RINGS, TIECLASPS, TIECLIPS, TIETACKS, BADGES AND MEDALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, GARTERS AND ARM BANDS | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | BONNET PINS; BUCKLES (NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL), SASH CLIPS, HAIRPINS, RIBBONS, ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS MADE OF CLOTH, PAPER OR PLASTICS, HAIRBANDS AND HAIRCLIPS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |