USPTO serial 73677864
INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING STRATEGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING STRATEGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT & KIMBALL2306 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TUTORING SERVICES AND CONDUCTING CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION TO OVERCOME LEARNING PROBLEMS AND TO OPTIMIZE LEARNING ABILITIES | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |