USPTO serial 73678104
KUROS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KUROS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA A. SUNBERG
BARBARA A SUNBERG POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN655 15TH ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY-SPECIALTY LIQUEURS AND WINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 1990 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 26, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |