USPTO serial 73678453
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MOOSBURG/ISAR, DE
MOOSBURG/ISAR, DE
STEINBOCK BOSS GMBH FORDERTECHNIK
D-85368 MOOSBURG, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID TOREN
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | FORCE-GUIDED AND INDUCTIVELY FORCE-GUIDED GROUND CONVEYORS; PARTS/ACCESSORIES FOR MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TRANSFER SLIDES, CLAMPING SLIDES, LOAD STABILIZERS, ROTATING HEADS, LATERAL SLIDES, SWIVEL SLIDE UNITS AND FORK ADJUSTING UNITS; MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS, COMPRISING STATIONARY AND MOVABLE STORAGE FRAMES AND CONVEYOR BELTS; WINCHES; HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC JACKS; HYDRAULIC PRESSES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 27, 1976 |
| 012 | MATERIAL HANDLING VEHICLES, NAMELY, FORK LIFTS AND LIFT TRUCKS, PALLET STACKER TRUCKS; PARTS/ACCESSORIES FOR FORK LIFT TRUCKS, NAMELY, LOAD ABSORBING UNITS, FOLDING FORKS, MULTI-PRONGED FORKS, MANDRELS, CLAMPS, CLAMPING FORKS, SHOVELS, LOAD TILTERS AND CRANE JIBS; TOW TRUCKS AND TOWING DOLLIES; GUIDE RAILS AND RETAINERS FOR SECURING CARGO ONTO VEHICLES, GROUND HANDLING VEHICLES FOR AIRCRAFT; SELF-PROPELLED TOWING DOLLIES; CONTAINER DOLLIES AND TRAILERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 27, 1976 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 8, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 11, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |