USPTO serial 73678526
Serial No. 73678526
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 73678526?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH READING, MA
NORTH READING, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth Solomon
Kenneth Solomon Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, L.C.101 South Hanley RoadSuite 1700St. Louis, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |