Drawing for Serial No. 73678963

USPTO serial 73678963

Serial No. 73678963

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1516075Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 1988
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73678963?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN T. ROGERS

JOHN T ROGERS ROGERS, HOWELL & HAFERKAMPPIERRE LACLEDE CTR7733 FORSYTH BLVD STE 1400ST LOUIS, MO 63105-1817

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025PROTECTIVE METAL-REINFORCED SAFETY SHOESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 3, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 1993C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 8, 1992C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 6, 1988R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 12, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 14, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance