USPTO serial 73679669
A-L STAINLESS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A-L STAINLESS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. PARR
RICHARD J PARR ROGERS BERESKIN & PARRSTE 3710 COMMERCE COURT POSTAL STATIONP O BOX 313TORONTO, ON M5L 1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | LARGE METAL CONTAINERS FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGES, DAIRY, CHEMICAL, PETROCHEMICAL AND NUCLEAR INDUSTRY USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 29, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |