USPTO serial 73679912
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 1991
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIDEO TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NORTHBROOK, IL
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NORTHBROOK, IL
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NORTHBROOK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD EUGENE DICK
RICHARD EUGENE DICK LAW OFFICE OF DICK AND HARRIS200 W MADISON ST STE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAMES FOR THE TEACHING OF CHILDREN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named VIDEO TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |