USPTO serial 73679930
SUNNEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNNEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD B. ROCKMAN
HOWARD B ROCKMAN LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE, SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ADHESIVES FOR USE IN THE BONDING OR ADHESION OF VARIOUS MATERIALS, NAMELY, SHOES AND IN THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, INCLUDING URETHANE FOAM, HIGH FOAMING POLYETHYLNE FOAM, POLYPROPYLENE CLOTH, GLASS WOOL, HEMP FELT, AND VARIOUS KINDS OF CLOTH, PVC LEATHER, PAINTED SURFACES, AND METALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | SEALING AGENTS FOR MORTAR, CONCRETE, STONEWORK, MARBLE, GRANITE, GLASS, METAL, SLATE, BOARDS, AND OTHER BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION SURFACES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |