USPTO serial 73679971
ALUPLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALUPLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MURRAY SCHAFFER, ESQ.
MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RDMINEOLA, NY 11501-4477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | WINDOW FRAMES AND WINDOW FRAME AND PANE ASSEMBLIES PRIMARILY OF NON-METAL WITH METAL REINFORCEMENT CORE | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1968 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |