Drawing for ARIZONA INSTRUMENT

USPTO serial 73680125

ARIZONA INSTRUMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIZONA INSTRUMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. ROBERT VON HELLENS

C ROBERT VON HELLENS CAHILL, SUTTON & THOMAS1400 VALLEY BANK CTRPHOENIX, AZ 85073UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES FOR EQUIPMENT FOR ANALYZING THE VOLATILE MASS OF A SPECIMEN UNDER TEST AND FOR EQUIPMENT FOR DETECTING A SPECIFIC GASEOUS COMPOUNDABANDONEDMar 31, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 3, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance