USPTO serial 73680671
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L. KIRKPATRICK
RICHARD L KIRKPATRICK CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN11TH FL1615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MEASUREMENT APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING THE SURFACE FLATNESS OF MOVING PRODUCTS AND/OR FOR THE CORRECTION OF FLATNESS DEFECTS SO DETECTED; OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF THE SURFACE FLATNESS OF PRODUCTS HAVING LIGHT REFLECTING PROPERTIES, NOTABLY FOR MOVING METALLURGICAL PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | FABRICATION OF METALLURGICAL FLAT PRODUCTS BY ROLLING, MEASUREMENT OF THE SURFACE FLATNESS OF METALLURGICAL MOVING PRODUCTS AND CORRECTION OF FLATNESS DEFECTS SO DETECTED | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |