Drawing for BOW T' STERN

USPTO serial 73680732

BOW T' STERN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1745384Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 12, 1993
Examiner
BLUE, RACHEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BOW T' STERN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK I FELDMAN

MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001MARINE CHEMICALS; NAMELY, ADHESIVES FOR MARINE USE; CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE WITH MARINE DIESEL FUELSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 9, 1987
002PROTECTIVE COATINGS, PAINTS, STAINS, VARNISHES AND LACQUERS, PRESERVATIVES AGAINST RUST AND WOOD DETERIORATION, ALL FOR MARINE USESECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 9, 1987
003CLEANING PREPARATIONS FOR MARINE USE; NAMELY, SPRAY WAX FOR FIBERGLASS, GLASS AND METAL, LIQUID AND PASTE STAIN REMOVING COMPOUNDS FOR FIBERGLASS, METAL AND PAINTED SURFACES; SILICON-BASED POLISHING AGENTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 9, 1987
004PTFE-BASED ENGINE PARTS LUBRICANT, FLUOROCARBON-BASED STEERING SYSTEM LUBRICANT AND PETROLEUM-BASED FUEL ADDITIVES FOR MARINE USESECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 9, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2003CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 16, 1998C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 26, 1998815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 12, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 1992REINREINSTATED—
Sep 26, 1991ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 1989PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 17, 1989PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance