USPTO serial 73681215
CHOCRACKLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOCRACKLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP E. KURZ
PHILIP E KURZ NIES, WEBNER KURZ & BERGERTSTE 7062121 CRYSTAL DRARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BISCUITS, COOKIES AND CRACKERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |