USPTO serial 73681599
BAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1531469Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 1989
- Examiner
- SHALLANT, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LEVERKUSEN-BAYERWERK, DE
LEVERKUSEN-BAYERWERK, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN D. FAIRCHILD
STANLEY C MACEL III CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANING, POLISHING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS FOR LEATHER; CLEANING MATERIALS AND PREPARATIONS FOR USE WITH GLASS, ALUMINUM, PLASTICS AND TEXTILES; BLEACHING AGENTS - ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | EXPIRED | — |
| 004 | OILS, GREASES AND LUBRICANTS - ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | RUBBER AND RUBBER SUBSTITUTES; GASKETS AND PACKINGS; MATERIALS FOR PROTECTING AGAINST LOSS OF HEAT, INSULATING MATERIALS - ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | EXPIRED | — |
| 022 | ROPES, STRING, NETS, CORDAGE, WIRE ROPES; PADDING AND STUFFING MATERIALS; RAW FIBROUS TEXTILE MATERIALS - ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | EXPIRED | — |
| 023 | YARNS AND THREADS - ALL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Similar marks named BAYER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 24, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |