USPTO serial 73681647
TINTORETTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TINTORETTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD T. SHEKLETON
GERALD T SHEKLETON WELSH & KATZ, LTD135 LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | VIDEO TAP AND OBJECT ROTOSCOPING | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |