USPTO serial 73681702
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | MINERAL WATER | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |