USPTO serial 73681893
QUINBY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUINBY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN SCHIMANDLE
KATHLEEN SCHIMANDLE DILLINGHAM & MURPHY605 MARKET ST 14TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED AND OR BLANK VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES | ABANDONED | Jun 30, 1987 |
| 016 | CHILDREN'S BOOKS, ART SUPPLIES, NAMELY ARTISTS BRUSHES, AND PENCILS, EASELS, SKETCH PADS, CLAY AND CRAFT ITEMS | ABANDONED | Jun 30, 1987 |
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY INFANT TOYS, SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, PLUSH ANIMALS AND STORY BOOK FIGURES | ABANDONED | Jun 30, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |