USPTO serial 73682415
COME OUT AND PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COME OUT AND PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOUTH YARRA, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER W. GOWDEY
PETER W GOWDEY CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN11TH FL1615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER NAMELY, POSTERS, STICKERS BOOKS, PAMPHLETS AND CALENDARS, ALL RELATING TO OR PROMOTING COMMUNITY HEALTH, EDUCATIONAL RECREATIONAL AND SPORTING ACTIVITIES, AND THE CREATIVE AND BENEFICIAL USE OF LEISURE TIME | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, JACKETS, FOOTWEAR AND HEADGEAR | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING, PROMOTING, CONDUCTING, SPONSORING, AND CONSULTING IN RELATION TO SPORTING, RECREATIONAL, EXERCISE FITNESS AND LEISURE PROGRAMS, EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |