USPTO serial 73682445
STOWAWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STOWAWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS E. BEALL, JR.
THOMAS E BEALL JR104 E HUME AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | STACKABLE AND NESTABLE INJECTION MNOLDED PLASTIC TOTE BOXES WITH TWO INTERDIGITATING LIDS FOR RECREATIONAL AND HOUSEHOLD STORAGE USE | ABANDONED | Mar 18, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |