USPTO serial 73682692
ALCAN-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALCAN-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
MINATO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERT A. COLLISON
BERT A COLLISON NIMS, HOWES, COLLISON, HANSEN & LACKERT605 THIRD AVE STE 3500NEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY AND IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, MICROWAVE ASHING SYSTEMS AND REACTIVE ION ETCHERS, ALL FOR THE USE IN THE MANUFACTURING OF SEMI-CONDUCTOR DEVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CANON SALES CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CANON SALES CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALCAN-TECH CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALCAN-TECH CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ALCAN-TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 3, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |