USPTO serial 73682739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MARKHAM, ONTARIO L3R 4Y4, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO L3R 4Y4, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO L3R 4Y4, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT F. DELBRIDGE
JOANNE GILLESPIE CANADA L3R 4Y4MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC36 APPLE CREEK BLVDMARKHAM, ON L3R 4Y4| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | MAGNETIC LAMINATIONS FOR MOTORS AND TRANSFORMER, AND ELECTRICAL HEADLAMP ASSEMBLIES FOR LAND VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | MOTORISED LAND VEHICLES AND PARTS, COMPONENTS AND ASSEMBLIES THEREFOR; NAMELY, ENGINE COOLING FAN MOTORS, HEATER AND AIR CONDITIONING MOTORS, WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTORS, CLUTCH AND BRAKE PEDAL ASSEMBLIES, LATCHES FOR HOODS, DOORS AND TRUNKS, AUTOMOTIVE SEATS, OUTSIDE REARVIEW MIRRORS, BUMPERS, WINDOW WINDING MECHANISMS, DRIVE BELT ASSEMBLIES FOR ENGINE ACCESSORIES, INSTRUMENT PANEL ASSEMBLIES, AND AUDIBLE ELECTRONIC ALARMS FOR INDICATING UNSAFE VEHICLE CONDITIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |