Drawing for SIMPLEX SYSTEM

USPTO serial 73684521

SIMPLEX SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLEX SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT A. BROWN

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007GANTRY CRANE SYSTEM FOR STACKING LARGE CONTAINERS, COMPRISED PRINCIPALLY OF HOISTS, TROLLEYS, SPREAKERS, AND DRIVES, BRAKES AND STEERING MECHANISMSABANDONEDMay 22, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 1990EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 27, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 29, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance