Drawing for MARKS & SPENCER

USPTO serial 73684606

MARKS & SPENCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARKS & SPENCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. M. DEROSA

F M DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT AND CAFETERIA SERVICES; MAIL ORDER SERVICES; RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORE SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 30, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 12, 1990PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 25, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 26, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 30, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance