USPTO serial 73684606
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. M. DEROSA
F M DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT AND CAFETERIA SERVICES; MAIL ORDER SERVICES; RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |