USPTO serial 73684843
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COHOES, NY
COHOES, NY
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
MYRTLE BEACH, SC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A FLYNT
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN, LLPSTE 6001300 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1995 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |