USPTO serial 73685013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
5281 RM BOXTEL, NL
BOXTEL, NL
5281 RM BOXTEL, NL
5281 RM BOXTEL, NL
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attention: Tracy BakerDenver, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE BASE AMPLIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSTIC USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |