USPTO serial 73685776
MARIBEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1650240Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 1991
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARIBEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER D. AMES
WALTER D AMES WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED FOODS SOLD TO GROCERY STORES AND SUPERMARKETS IN CANS, BOTTLES, AND PAPERBOARD CONTAINERS; NAMELY, MEAT, AND VEGETABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 1986 |
| 030 | CONDIMENTS; NAMELY, MUSTARD, KETCHUP, SALT, VINEGAR, SPICES AND PASTA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIGORIFICO PEREZ HNOS., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIGORIFICO PEREZ HNOS., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIGORIFICO PEREZ HNOS., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MARIBEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |