Drawing for BE BE WELD

USPTO serial 73686293

BE BE WELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLUE, RACHEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE BE WELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. STEPHEN SAMUELS

I STEPHEN SAMUELS SAMUELS, GAUTHIER, STEVENS & KEHOESTE 3300225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CEMENT USED IN THE MANUFACTURE AND REPAIR OF SHOES AND BOOTSABANDONEDMay 8, 1953

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jan 4, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 29, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 27, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 14, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 8, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 28, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance