Drawing for LOG II

USPTO serial 73686766

LOG II

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOG II?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT C. FABER

ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION AND MINING DEVELOPMENTABANDONED—
042ANALYSIS OF GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION; AND MINING DATA AND PLOTTING PLANS, SECTIONS, GEOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND ORE RESERVESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 28, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance