USPTO serial 73689529
COTAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COTAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD J. TANIS
RONALD J TANIS FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTROLYTIC POLISHING MACHINE AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |