USPTO serial 73689613
CARING FOR CUSTOMERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARING FOR CUSTOMERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CROWS NEST, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. SLATTERY
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCHP O BOX 747301 N WASHINGTON STFALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INSTRUCTIONAL AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES, AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | MANUALS, PAMPHLETS AND BOOKLETS FOR TRAINING SALES PERSONS IN CUSTOMER SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING COURSES IN IMPROVING CUSTOMER SERVICE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |