USPTO serial 73689689
MORGAN THERMAL CERAMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MORGAN THERMAL CERAMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM R. HINDS
WILLIAM R HINDS727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | HOUSE MARK FOR INDUSTRIAL GOODS MADE WHOLLY OR PRINCIPALLY OF CERMAIC MATERIALS FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL HEATING, DRYING, BURNING, MELTING OR CASTING | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | HOUSE MARK FOR INDUSTRIAL GOODS MADE WHOLLY OR PRINCIPALLY OF CERAMIC MATERIALS, AND IN THE FORM OR BULK FIBER, LOOSE SPUN FIBER, BLANKETS, CLOTH, PADS, STRIPS, TAPES, BLOCK, SHEET, BOARD OR COMPOSITE FORM, FOR HEAT INSULATING USE | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | HOUSE MARK FOR INDUSTRIAL FOR REFRACTORY ARTICLES AND MATERIAL FOR REFRACTORY USE, MADE WHOLLY OR PRINCIPALLY OF CERAMIC MATERIALS, AND IN PLASTIC, GRANULAR, POWDER, BRICK OR BLOCK FORM | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF INDUSTRIAL PLANTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES, ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MORGAN CRUCIBLE COMPANY PLC, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MORGAN THERMAL CERAMICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |