USPTO serial 73689763
GENI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANNY L. WILLIAMS
DANNY L WILLIAMS ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH COMPUTER VIDEO EQUIPMENT, NAMELY ELECTRONIC MOUSE FOR CURSER CONTROL | ABANDONED | Jul 23, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |