USPTO serial 73690080
BANJO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANJO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES Y. LACKEY
CHARLES Y LACKEY SARA LEE CORPORATIONP O BOX 2760WINSTON SALEM, NC 27102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | HAM | ABANDONED | Aug 20, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 29, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |