USPTO serial 73690490
VAN CLEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAN CLEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHALL A. LERNER, ESQ.
MARSHALL A LERNER ESQ ARANT, KLEINBERG & LERNERSTE 8802049 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | CUSTOMIZED LIMOUSINES | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |