USPTO serial 73690941
CAUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BRAMPTON, ONTATIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNICE E. SILVERMAN
BERNICE E SILVERMAN BURGESS, RYAN AND WAYNE370 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |