USPTO serial 73692660
ASTROMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASTROMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM M. LEE, JR.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMSITH, ET ALSTE 300105 W ADAMS STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIGHT DETECTING APPARATUS; IMAGING SYSTEMS COMPRISING SCANNERS AND DISPLAYS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC AND PARTICLE RADIATION AND BEAMS; ASSAY SCANNING APPARATUS FOR INVITRO USE; COMPUTER APPARATUS AND PROGRAMS FOR CONTROL FOR SUCH LIGHT DETECTING APPARATUS, IMAGING SYSTEMS AND ASSAY SCANNING APPARATUS, AND FOR ANALYSIS OF IMAGING AND OTHER DATA; AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |